LD Debater!

Would you like to react to this message? Create an account in a few clicks or log in to continue.
LD Debater!

A forum for high school Lincoln-Douglas debate.


3 posters

    Ethics behind cutting evidence

    avatar
    JohnnyFontane
    Elimination Rounds
    Elimination Rounds


    Posts : 107
    Reputation : -1
    Join date : 2009-02-05

    Ethics behind cutting evidence Empty Ethics behind cutting evidence

    Post  JohnnyFontane Tue Feb 24, 2009 5:00 pm

    I think this issue might go under the theory section as I am more interested in how one would justify the practice than how we should change the norm across the circuit. Anyway, I am wondering why the common practice of bolding and underlining/minimizing large portions of the text of cards is ethical. Honestly, I couldn't imagine turning in a paper in english class with 5-15 sets of ellipses within a single quotation. However, people read each other's cards during/after rounds and I have never seen anyone make a big deal out of how cards are cut unless something ridiculous has been removed. Should we really be changing the meaning of the evidence that much?
    avatar
    Old
    Debate Fanatic
    Debate Fanatic


    Posts : 51
    Reputation : 0
    Join date : 2009-02-10

    Ethics behind cutting evidence Empty Re: Ethics behind cutting evidence

    Post  Old Tue Feb 24, 2009 6:35 pm

    You shouldn't put ellipses, but you can make the words smaller. At a glance, you can just say the argument in the card wasn't made for a debate round, so some of the surrounding content would just confuse people and wouldn't be helpful. Moreover, they can read the card during the round; it's their fault they didn't ask. Ellipses bad is a pretty easy position if they don't have the full text with them because it kills predictability, skews research burdens, etc.
    avatar
    poneill
    Elimination Rounds
    Elimination Rounds


    Posts : 104
    Reputation : 3
    Join date : 2009-02-07
    Location : Murderapolis

    Ethics behind cutting evidence Empty Re: Ethics behind cutting evidence

    Post  poneill Tue Feb 24, 2009 8:01 pm

    JohnnyFontane wrote:I think this issue might go under the theory section as I am more interested in how one would justify the practice than how we should change the norm across the circuit. Anyway, I am wondering why the common practice of bolding and underlining/minimizing large portions of the text of cards is ethical. Honestly, I couldn't imagine turning in a paper in english class with 5-15 sets of ellipses within a single quotation. However, people read each other's cards during/after rounds and I have never seen anyone make a big deal out of how cards are cut unless something ridiculous has been removed. Should we really be changing the meaning of the evidence that much?

    The idea is you're not changing the meaning, but rather, reducing wordiness of a quotation. This type of thing is done in newspapers/other forums constrained by a word/time limit. You wouldn't honestly want to quote the entire section of an article/book that you have in the card.

    Sponsored content


    Ethics behind cutting evidence Empty Re: Ethics behind cutting evidence

    Post  Sponsored content


      Current date/time is Mon May 06, 2024 5:10 am